this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
418 points (99.3% liked)

PC Gaming

8501 readers
630 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I say, just reducing that time, or make it case dependent would be a great start

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would certainly benefit companies developing generative AI. The sooner something loses copyright protection, the easier it is to use it as training data.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Big AI companies already have that data used, and copyright is mostly a concern for the openSource models.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

AI companies that used copyrighted data without paying are facing multiple lawsuits. Those lawsuits would go away if copyright went away.