this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
825 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2239 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

And you think Trump will be better? No, Jill Stein isn't going to win.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well Trump is also saying good things about Genocide that's what the article about.

Pot calling the kettle black.

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

That's his point exactly.

If your only two choices are genocide 1 and genocide 2 then you've fucked up pretty bad as a country

Hell this country has only been around 300 years and it's started more wars than most people can count.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Isn't it common knowledge at this point that Jill Stein is literally a spoil candidate who only ever seems to exist every four years as a "I'm a Leftist, but I only have bad things to say about Democrats, what a coincidence?" candidate with an uncomfortably large amount of ties to Russia?

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Isn’t it common knowledge at this point that Jill Stein is literally a spoil candidate

To all but the most naive it is.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

You would think so, right?

[–] LotrOrc@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He didn't say that, you just jumped into but Jill stein

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because a lot of the "Democrats are pro genocide" crew seem to be Stein stans. Maybe he's not, but the point was that there are two possible outcomes of the election in November and saying "I can't vote for someone who's pro-genocide" is a bullshit copout.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It really is considering one is merely twiddling their thumbs as Palestine burns, the option that isn't Harris aspires to be literally Hitler.

Ya think if you gave a shit about genocide you'd, I dunno... Not want to risk "Literally Hitler" getting into power?

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago

Genocide occurs with either one. Get a clue. If you dont like it, tell your reps and stfu about peoples voting decisions. Its not your place to judge their decisions with their votes.

If harris loses because of her support for genocide thats on her for not reading the room in two of only 5 states that matter.

Sucks to be her and the Democrats but thems the breaks when your partisan and incapable of doing the right thing

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They think any anti-harries statement is Pro Russia and Pro Trump and calls for Stein vote.

I am not a US citizen, and the US foreign policy never change between the two parties and I will never advocate or try to tell people who to vote for.

[–] LengAwaits@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago

the US foreign policy never change between the two parties

This is such a reductionist take on an incredibly broad and complex topic that I have to wonder whether you're joking.