Hardware

5004 readers

3 users here now

This is a community dedicated to the hardware aspect of technology, from PC parts, to gadgets, to servers, to industrial control equipment, to semiconductors.

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to electronic hardware
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

Why are we OK with thick folding phones, but not with thick no-folds? (youtu.be)

submitted 2 weeks ago by atro_city@fedia.io to c/hardware@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Was watching this video on the "tri-fold" phone by MKBHD and that thing is thicc! I don't care about folds, but I can't find a single phone without a fold ~~phone~~ that is that thick. The battery life would be amazing...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] colin@lemmy.uninsane.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

Why are we OK with thick folding phones, but not with thick no-folds?

i think by "we" you mean the manufacturers? AFAICT they just gave away the game: the push for thin phones was more from the supply side than the demand side. not saying people don't generally prefer thin phones -- just that the preference is probably weaker than has been made out to be.

that said, i think it's more fair to compare things like cubic volume and weight than just the thinness. a 1/2" thick full-size phone would be uncomfortable in my pocket, whereas a 1/2" thick wallet-sized phone might actually be more comfortable than a traditional smartphone.