Technology

59419 readers

5179 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

512

T-Mobile, AT&T oppose unlocking rule, claim locked phones are good for users (arstechnica.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 119 points 3 weeks ago (17 children)

So the story is 'if they have to be unlocked, we can't offer discounts on the phones'.

Okay fine but uh, the last time I used a post-paid subsidized phone, I signed a contract. That stipulated how much I'd pay for however many months, and what the early cancellation fee was, as well as what the required buy-out for the phone was if I left early.

In what way is that insufficient to ensure that a customer spends the money to justify the subsidy?

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago

Nono that wasn’t a service contract, it was a payment plan on the phone. And you can’t cancel the service until you pay off the phone.

It’s different…. Really….

load more comments (16 replies)