this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
121 points (99.2% liked)

Ukraine

8437 readers
839 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³πŸ’₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

πŸ’³βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

πŸͺ– 🫑 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

According to an anonymous European diplomat, if Democratic candidate Kamala Harris wins the US presidential election, it can be assumed that Joe Biden will start working on an invitation to Ukraine during the transition period.

The implication though... what if she doesn't?

I guess they can't invite Ukraine in the transition period if Trump would shoot it down? But why can't they just rush the ratification?

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

because it surely won't accept it before Donald Trump gets sworn in

anyone against it can simply delay and "raise concerns" for a few months

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago

it’s possible that if they rushed it through now, it’d give trump ammo for leaving nato entirely