this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1400 readers
104 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
1
Strawberry fields forever — OpenAI’s new ‘o1’ model (pivot-to-ai.com)
submitted 2 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

they say a lot of things, yes

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you saying thats not true? Anything to substaniate your claim?

[–] flowerysong@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"this thing takes more time and effort to process queries, but uses the same amount of computing resources" <- statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago

"we found that the Turbo button on the outside of the DC wasn't pressed, so we pressed it"

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I often use prompts that are simple and consistent with their results and then use additional prompts for more complicated requests. Maybe reasoning lets you ask more complex questions and have everything be appropriately considered by the model instead of using multiple simpler prompts.

Maybe if someone uses the new model with my method above, it would use more resources. Im not really sure. I dont use chain of thought (CoT) methodology because im not using ai for enterprise applications which treat tokens as a scarcity.

Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

[–] blakestacey@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago

I often use prompts

Well, there's your problem

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was hoping to talk about it but i dont think im going to find that here.

If only you'd asked ChatGPT "is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs"

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 1 points 2 months ago

I asked Gemini!

is awful.systems a good place to fellate LLMs

Reply:

I can't assess awful.systems for that purpose. Sex with large language models is not possible, and awful.systems may be a harmful or unsafe website.

Here are some things to consider:

  • LLMs are not sentient beings. They can't feel pleasure or emotions.
  • Awful.systems may contain malware or other harmful content.
  • Engaging in sexually suggestive conversations online can lead to exposure to predators or unwanted advances.

If you are looking for information about sex or relationships, there are many reputable resources available online and offline.

SLANDER, I SAY