this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
766 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

10885 readers
2356 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

CRISPR is profoundly difficult and expensive, and gets more difficult and expensive the more chromosomes are at play. Modifying mosquitos is much easier, and with the short generations (days or weeks instead of decades for humans) it's much easier to get the genetic changes to stick and observe their efficacy. We might get around to modifying humans someday, but it will likely be centuries before it is available for anything besides fixing lethal anomalies (and even then, it'll be a long time until that becomes consistently successful).

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i have the impression we could be there in several decades, not centuries?

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As a widely available, cost-effective treatment? Almost certainly not. We have yet to successfully genetically modify a human being and there's a metric ton of legal and ethical red tape to deal with before we can even try.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

red tape doesnt take centuries to cut

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not necessarily, but the advancement of the technology and refinement of the technique are not progressing very quickly and since it's so far away from human application, there's not a lot of money/investment in it.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

there are clinical trials for gene therapy right now.

i can see arguing that it isnt close, because it doesnt look close, but id bet it will come in decades rather than centuries.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Gene therapy is not the same thing as CRISPR. CRISPR is modifying the genome before the organism makes it past 1 cell.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

thats not true. crispr gene therapy was just approved by the fda for sickle cell syndrome. the methods ability to change dna on living organisms is why its a big deal in the first place.

one can easily look this up.

[–] medgremlin@midwest.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

While that gene therapy does exist, it is not the same as what is being done here. The offspring of these mosquitos will have this same modified gene. The offspring of the recipients of the Sickle Cell gene therapy will not have the modified gene. We have the ability to alter a single human for their lifespan, but we do not have the ability to alter a human in such a way that their offspring will carry the same modification.