Programming

17423 readers

25 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

The ongoing feud between Wordpress and WP Engine is threatening open-source principles and good name (www.techspot.com)

submitted 1 month ago by AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today to c/programming@programming.dev

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RonSijm@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because Wordpress is also hosting 1000s of plugins that WP engine users can install.

I'm not sure what the license regarding those things is, WP engine could probably just mirror it -

But they basically got locked out of the default ecosystem infrastructure.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I feel like mirroring the plugins would resolve this issue, since the argument seems to be centered on server costs.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

The argument centering on server costs would be logical, but the actual legal battle going on, and Mullenweg's stated justification behind asking for 8% of WPEngine profit, is claims of misuse of copyrighted names.

Meanwhile the WordPress license explicitly cedes copyright over the name WordPress and the initialism WP.