this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1333 readers
98 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (15 children)

I don't think it's alive, I think it's talking to its self. They're making a Chinese whisper machine, and it will remain so until it has embodiment, subjective and changing goals, and a will of it's own.

That's part of intelligence, but it's still a reverse engineering take on things.

In actuality we have intelligence because our threat detection and social protection/survival goals became abstract enough for self-awareness to occur.

EDIT: Telephone game is what I meant.

[–] swlabr@awful.systems 0 points 4 weeks ago (14 children)

Chinese whisper

Complete tangent but outside of the commonwealth, this game is referred to by the much less racist moniker “telephone”

[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

I figured he was talking about Searle's Chinese room thought experiment. Searle sucks though, so that's probably also racist (in addition to being stupid.)

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

In 2024 it is, at the very least, extremely uncomfortable to read Searle describe Chinese writing as "meaningless scribbles", "formal symbols"*, "squiggle squiggle", and "squoggle squoggle". Basically taking Chinese, ignoring the fact that it's a real language used by real people and is not alien nor inscrutable nor mathematical, and using it as a prop to purposefully obfuscate a thought experiment.

But that's like, just my opinion man.

* The paper never seems to get around to calling English letters symbols I wonder why.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)