this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
978 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

11036 readers
3491 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Johanno@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Many unedited or using old Ai images I can detect with one look. A few more I can find by looking for inconsistencies like hands or illogical items.

However I am sure there will be more AI generated images that may even be a little bit edited afterwards that I can't detect.

You will need an ai to detect them. Since at least in images ai is detectable by the way they create the files.

[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In AI-generated sound you can see it in the waveform, it has less random noise altogether and it seems like a huge, well, wave. I wonder if sth similar is true for images.

[–] hex@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago

Basically yes, lack of detail, especially small things like hair or fingers. The texture/definition in AI images is usually less. Though, once again, depends on the technique being used.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

I heard they managed to put some noise into ai generated audio, so it's even more difficult to tell it