this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

3904 readers
7 users here now

Europa

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you look at the comment history from OP it's pretty clear where they stand.

[–] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where they stand on other comments? To put it in the most aggresive light- you were called out for inaccurate information. Even so, you must've recognized the original post was factually incorrect because you changed the post title. Why not just own it. It goes like this, 'Oops, copied the title with the photo. I fixed it.' No big deal. Of course, making a mistake, quietly trying to fix it, then pretending the person pointing it out is in the wrong is another way to go.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I updated the title since I couldn't find collaborating information. I can't verify it. However, that doesn't change the fact that OP has a very clear agenda.

[–] Sh3Rm4n@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And you have a problem with them because of their agenda that they are calling out that you are posting stuff without any source / proof?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, I have a problem with them constantly spamming NATO propaganda. Literally the only thing this account does.

[–] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You posted something you didn't verify then attacked/dismissed the person who pointed it out because of your bias coming in. Does that mean that they don't also have an agenda? No. Does it help me to trust anything you post? Also no.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Sure, we all have our biases. I've had lots of negative interactions with the person in question, and I don't take anything they say to be in good faith. It is what it is.