this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
160 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
58451 readers
6215 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm interested to see how this turns out, because I'm thinking this would significantly increase maintenance costs on those panels due to rocks being kicked up, vibration from the train, etc.
Maybe it’s like a blanket that the train picks up over its head and runs underneath, setting it back down on the ground after it
Reminds me of this, but in reverse:
https://youtu.be/_0tVlLZLzeo?t=308
Pretty close. Quick lets patent it
There shouldn't be any rocks kicked up because the trains should stay on the rails, not touch the ballast.
But dirt, debris, and brake dust will absolutely collect very quickly. Maybe they're counting on rain to keep them clean.
There’s still massive amounts of air pressure changes Those can definitely lift some smaller rocks
You do get the advantage of easy and above all fast placement.
Not sure how this would work out. There's pros and cons I suppose.