this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
189 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

58451 readers
5673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

They also offer the Azure Stack HCI platform, which is the modern version of hyper-v, but goddamn is it a pain in the ass (and requires active connection and subscription to azure for onprem workloads).

It's alright, but it's my least favorite of the 3 platforms we run.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I think administrative overhead is the hidden cost that a lot of technology vendors fail to consider. Microsoft is especially guilty of this. Is a "good" product that requires an obscene amount of esoteric knowledge and experience to maintain really that good?

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, I'm definitely not the biggest fan of HCI, especially the reporting aspect of it. I had to write my own damn reports just to see how badly we over provisioned disks once we found out it only reports on actual utilization.

I tolerate Microsoft products and admin them, but damn they're annoying to use at times.