Technology

60112 readers

1865 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

374

Devs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistants (www.cio.com)

submitted 2 months ago by psychothumbs@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

131 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Places GPT-based "AI" next to flying cars

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Flying cars exist, they’re just not cost effective. AFAICT there’s no GPT that is proficient at coding yet.

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's a lot easier to access ChatGPT than it is to access a flying car

[–] sepi@piefed.social 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The more people using chatgpt to generate low quality code they don't understand, the more job safety and greater salary I get.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

As far as I know, right now the main problem with flying cars is that they are nowhere near as idiot-proof as a normal car, and don't really solve any transportation problem since most countries' air regulations agencies would require them to exclusively take off and land in airports... Where you can usually find tons of planes that can go much further (and are much more cost effective, as you pointed out)