this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
985 points (98.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20933 readers
1665 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

It's never unethical to pirate Adobe, but it's always more ethical to use Free Software instead and deny Adobe the mindshare.

[–] Remotedeck@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

It's far more ethical to make the company lose money

Minimum amount for photoshop is 22$/month

Pirate photoshop

Delete it

Pirate again

Repeat 30 times

Adobe looses 660$

If everyone does this adobe will loose so much

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Investors hate this one glitch!

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

They don't care as they have a massive profit margin. What matters more is the market share. You got to break the standard way of thinking industry wide.

[–] Rinox@feddit.it 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's not at all how piracy works. They don't lose any money by me not buying their product, the money was never theirs to lose. They can earn money if I buy it, but if I don't, then nothing changed. It's not like every company is entitled to my money.

Pirating or using Gimp or Krita instead, has the exact same effect on them, ie me not buying their product.

You must be fun at parties.

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

Lol I've been using cs5 until yesterday. V24 now

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

Gimp is behind on features and ui optimisation and krita is art focused

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago

Voice of reason