this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
196 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

58303 readers
3845 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Federal Trade Commission is taking action against multiple companies that have relied on artificial intelligence as a way to supercharge deceptive or unfair conduct that harms consumers, as part of its new law enforcement sweep called Operation AI Comply.

The cases being announced today include actions against a company promoting an AI tool that enabled its customers to create fake reviews, a company claiming to sell “AI Lawyer” services, and multiple companies claiming that they could use AI to help consumers make money through online storefronts.

“Using AI tools to trick, mislead, or defraud people is illegal,” said FTC Chair Lina M. Khan. “The FTC’s enforcement actions make clear that there is no AI exemption from the laws on the books. By cracking down on unfair or deceptive practices in these markets, FTC is ensuring that honest businesses and innovators can get a fair shot and consumers are being protected.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Amazing what happens with adequate funding. How long until Republicans open some sort of bullshit Congressional investigation that won't find anything but waste time and money, and as usual try to reduce funding by obviously punitive levels?

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Adequate funding and having a chair that isn't in the back pocket of industry.

Her enforcement is getting a fair bit of push back from the courts though, unsurprisingly mostly Republican appointees.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Harris megadonors are trying to buy favor in order to get Khan removed from the FTC position. I'm kinda worried that it will work.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Given that SCOTUS is focused on destroying the government one agency at a time, you're likely to see them rule that the FTC is unconstitutional because it didn't exist in the 1600s or some other equally-bullshit excuse.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago

I am attracted to her because of her sheer awesomeness. There I said it.