Technology

58287 readers

3423 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

715

Arch Linux and Valve Collaboration (lists.archlinux.org)

submitted 1 day ago by Aatube@kbin.melroy.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

139 comments fedilink hide all child comments

We are excited to announce that Arch Linux is entering into a direct collaboration with Valve. Valve is generously providing backing for two critical projects that will have a huge impact on our distribution: a build service infrastructure and a secure signing enclave. By supporting work on a freelance basis for these topics, Valve enables us to work on them without being limited solely by the free time of our volunteers.

This opportunity allows us to address some of the biggest outstanding challenges we have been facing for a while. The collaboration will speed-up the progress that would otherwise take much longer for us to achieve, and will ultimately unblock us from finally pursuing some of our planned endeavors. We are incredibly grateful for Valve to make this possible and for their explicit commitment to help and support Arch Linux.

These projects will follow our usual development and consensus-building workflows. [RFCs] will be created for any wide-ranging changes. Discussions on this mailing list as well as issue, milestone and epic planning in our GitLab will provide transparency and insight into the work. We believe this collaboration will greatly benefit Arch Linux, and are looking forward to share further development on this mailing list as work progresses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Or, more likely, the publisher. But, that's beside the point.

As it has been demonstrated when Epic tried the "developers pay less fees here" approach, the average Joe Gamer doesn't benefit in any way whatsoever. Your premise of the savings being passed down doesn't exactly pan out.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, Epic Store was marred by exclusives and having way less features back then. Even now, their (Electron) launcher boots up way slower than (CEF) Steam, and their sales are way worse.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Is it Electron? Someone elsewhere mentioned it was actually an instance of Unreal Engine running for the webview component. Something about the EGS install directory containing the same UE settings file that games use for initializing Unreal

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

IDK then. spinning up an entire game engine just to do what Electron does seems unbelievably wasteful though.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I just downloaded and installed EGS to a Windows VM.

strings EpicGamesLauncher.exe | select-string "unreal" returns some interesting results:

FCommunityPortalManagerImpl::SetUnrealEnginePortalViewModel
{USER}Unreal Engine/Engine/Config/User{TYPE}.ini
UnrealHeaderTool
Cannot call UnrealScript (%s - %s) while stopped at a breakpoint.
UnrealVersionSelector
Created with FUnrealEngineFileAssociationServiceFactory at D:/build/++Portal/Sync/Portal/Source/Programs/EpicGamesLauncher/Layers/Domain/Private/UserDomain.cpp:866

A search for "electron" only matches the words "Electronic Arts"

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

...wait, what does it say about EA?

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I already killed the VM, but it was something about an EA account if I recall correctly.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago

As it has been demonstrated when Epic tried the "developers pay less fees here" approach, the average Joe Gamer doesn't benefit in any way whatsoever. Your premise of the savings being passed down doesn't exactly pan out.

Oh really? Please do point me to the study you did where you gave 15% more revenue back to developers and then assessed their output quality.

Claiming that having the store take 15% less cut of revenue will have no effect is a quite frankly flat out absurd claim to make.