this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
-72 points (9.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8282 readers
1803 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
-72
PROOF: VALVE IS RIPPING EVERY PC GAMER OFF. (youtu.be)
submitted 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) by 101@feddit.org to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Use instead:

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

I can't deny that Steam has a large marketshare over the digital video game distribution market, and that it could abuse its position, and that the 30% distributor cut is steep. All true. Is it currently abusing its position? Arguably yes and no.

Looking through the evidence document provided in the video, the alleged link between decreased % of multihoming indicating the enforcement of a PMFN is weak IMO. Steam's support for Linux, its own Steam Deck, good customer service, return policy, family sharing and remote play are major reasons to be a Valve patron, not always about price.

The evidence at 9:05 in the video that suggests Valve says they "stop selling them altogether" was in response to a Steam Key inquiry. The other quotes were related to removing it from the front page and sales feature pages (not delisting but not there unless you search for it). That's not delisting but perhaps it is anti-competitively deranking it. I'm not sure what the rules are though, like a grocery store doesn't have to put a product at the front of a store when a rival has a steeper sale for it, but they could ask for the same discount while offering to make it similarly visible. Overall it's not nearly as serious as OOP makes it seem.