this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
953 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

58276 readers
6715 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Emi@ani.social 320 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

All fines should be percentage of income instead of some arbitrary number.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 129 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They also need to remove the limited liability from companies for intentional illegal activities.

illegal business practices should be charged to the people involved instead of the company. The executives who made the decision to break the law lose personal assets.

Otherwise the shitheads just pass the company losses onto the employees: no raises, hiring freezes, layoffs, reduction in benefits, etc...

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 21 points 17 hours ago

100%. We need more personal liability for the evils of big business, not less

[–] yuki2501@lemmy.world 69 points 19 hours ago

Intentional? Better use Negligent. It's hard to prove intent; knowledge of something going on is much easier to prove.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 12 points 19 hours ago

Why would the regime ever hurt itself tho?

[–] Skymt@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

And collected from shareholder payouts.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Shoulda coulda woulda.

My aunt recently gave me a good advice, and a person in one chat with, I suspect, very interesting expertise gave the same advice in different form.

Emotions harm reason, and propaganda is not just directed at suppressing or increasing the emotion. It's directed at making you emotional when you should be patient, and apathetic when you should be emotional, and act when you should wait, and wait when you should act.

It can easily work since everyone feels their fight of their day to be unique. But it's not, and more than that - you can always look a few years back and remember that not only was it predicted, but you yourself predicted it.

By all this smartassery I meant - people making the laws don't want them to work as we do, and they have sterilized the field. Think further.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The last sentence. You can say all you want in social media to blow off steam, but you'll only make things right in the real world with real power applied. And posting it here you've removed yourself from there.

Social media are not designed to be usable for organizing and combining those crumbs of power we all possess. They are actually designed for the opposite goal - to let everyone receive the dopamin hit from saying what should be done and forgetting it, from dispersing their power as thinly as possible. Look at your (EDIT: the guy I was replying to, didn't realize you're different people) 300+ likes, all worthless.

A self-regulating propaganda device, better than cheap and good brothels everywhere, or cheap alcohol and cheap and legal maryjane. Also alcohol and maryjane reduce one's labor value, while brothels can have an effect opposite to the desirable (there's need for validation in the society, thus in hierarchy, which gets reduced by being sexually content). Social media are better in both regards.