this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
889 points (97.6% liked)

Programming

17077 readers
801 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope, don't need to. WebStorm can even detect nonexistent attributes for objects whose format the back-end decides, and tbh I'm not sure what sort of sorcery it uses.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah IntelliJ does amazingly without type annotations but even it can't do everything. E.g. if you're using libraries without type annotations, or if you don't call functions with every possible type (is your testing that good? No.)

Static types have other benefits anyway so you should use them even if everyone in your team uses IntelliJ.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, our company has been meaning to transition to them for a while. I started saying Jsdoc comments but people complained about the pollution. Then I said fine, we'll do TypeScript one day instead.

That one day has yet to come. I don't actually get to decide much at this company, after all. Aah, technical debt.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 2 points 23 hours ago

I've never done it but apparently you can actually gradually transition to Typescript one file at a time by renaming them from .js to .ts. Might help a bit. Good luck anyway!