this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
221 points (88.0% liked)

politics

18930 readers
5279 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (22 children)

Endorsing is not the same as undying loyalty. Seems obvious. But I guess it has to be stated clearly.

I think it's perfectly fine to criticize anybody who says they'll do everything in their power to support LGBTQ+, and then refuse to endorse Harris (even though she basically has).

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago (14 children)

She said she is still voting for her. I wouldn't endorse someone active in genocide and who doesn't match my values as well. I think she was fair and told people to think for themselves. It is good to see a celeb that isn't a yes man for once.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (13 children)

I completely respect Gaza making people reluctant voters. But don't tell me you're doing everything in your power for LGBTQ+ if you're not going to support the only candidate who supports those rights. Just don't even mention it if you're going to contradict it.

Now, I only discovered who this person is this week (I heard one of her songs before all this stuff blew up). I don't hate this person. My issues with her stance is about as minor as it can possibly be.

I'm just a passive observer who is watching half the country vote for a megalomaniac, a sliver of ill informed cynics vote for a Russian stooge, and a bunch of otherwise rational Americans pretend they don't STRONGLY side with one party of another on 95% of issues.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You’re a passive consumer of cable news.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I watch enough cable news to know that they don't take the extremism on the right seriously enough. And they're too chicken shit to call it out 90% of the time because then they'll look biased. They try to attack the left over literally anything to appear impartial.

I pay attention to politics. And I notice the shit that happens that gets ignored.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 2 days ago

I think it’s because the corporate media supports corporate status quo of corporate politicians on both sides.

They manufacture culture wars when a real leftist starts to get their message out, for example the millionaire cable news hosts called out Bernie for having a million dollars after he wrote a New York Times best seller. lol, wtaf.

That’s one small example, but the corporate cable news doesn’t want us to see past R good D bad, or vice versa.

We actually have a lot more in common than we realize. Every body is pissed pff about money in politics, for example.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago

I think it’s because the corporate media supports corporate status quo of corporate politicians on both sides.

They manufacture culture wars when a real leftist starts to get their message out, for example the millionaire cable news hosts called out Bernie for having a million dollars after he wrote a New York Times best seller. lol, wtaf.

That’s one small example, but the corporate cable news doesn’t want us to see past R good D bad, or vice versa.

We actually have a lot more in common than we realize. Every body is pissed pff about money in politics, for example.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)