this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
95 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7222 readers
207 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The president can't intervene at the state level. From americanbar.org:

A U.S. president has broad but not unlimited powers to pardon. For example, a president cannot pardon someone for a state crime.

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think that's why they included the "fuck you, official act" part.

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The president's "official act" would be issuing the pardon. The referenced Supreme Court decision just means it would not be a "crime" for the president to issue said pardon, not that the pardon would stand.

[–] GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

That's true, so I guess it would need to be having the military intervene to extract him, so that you don't need to worry about what a state court says.

[–] 5C5C5C@programming.dev 0 points 1 month ago

The official act could be to use the national guard to rescue a US citizen from wrongful imprisonment, but that's the kind of thing that racist Republicans would start a civil war over in the name of "states' rights".