solarpunk memes

2611 readers

978 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tsugu@slrpnk.net

ex_06@slrpnk.net

Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net

316

I mean, let's not underestimate social phobias, but... (slrpnk.net)

submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The most important thing you can do for the climate is talk about it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

The question is, can nature produce enough new plants to match the rate that we increasingly emit CO2 into the atmosphere? My money is on.....no. At some point, a feedback loop will occur and render the soil infertile.

[–] general_kitten@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 days ago

After some googling plants will benefit from increased co2 levels until about 1000ppm and bad effects start at about 1500ppm so they would be safe even in the worst case climate change. Even humans can in theory survive as high as 5000ppm indefinitely at least in theory but at that point some CO2 poisoning effects would be felt. So basically a lot of other things would cause life to die before the co2 levels

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 4 days ago

"Enough" new plants for what? The new plants are a result of increased carbon dioxide levels. Carbon dioxide is basically an atmospheric fertilizer.

What do you mean by "enough" here?