this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
21 points (100.0% liked)
Formula 1
9080 readers
97 users here now
Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series
Rules
- Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
- No gambling, crypto or NFTs
- Spoilers are allowed
- Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
- Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
- Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
- Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but donβt want to become formuladank.
Up next
2024 Calendar
Location | Date |
---|---|
πΊπΈ United States | 21-23 Nov |
πΆπ¦ Qatar | 29 Nov-01 Dec |
π¦πͺ Abu Dhabi | 06-08 Dec |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't think so. For a rookie, it could be a year of valuable f1 experience which would mean they would be better prepared for the first proper year of audi in 2026
They must not value any available rookie highly enough. I assume they value safe hands more, and will go for another established driver even for 2026. Not saying it's the best approach but I can see the reasoning.
Got to say I don't see their logic. They got to build a successful team in the long term and changing drivers repeatedly does not aid that. All the youngsters who were successful in their first F2 season are good/great in F1 as well(Russell, leclerc, piastri, Norris, tsunoda) so neither pourchaire nor bortoleto are poor choices and I would argue are a better choice than bottas in the long term.
It all depends on how competitive they think they'll be right off the bat. If they think they'll be a contender right in 26 I'd agree with you, but the longer the timeframe the more sense "safe pair of hands" would make, to me at least.