this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
254 points (98.5% liked)

Videos

14313 readers
476 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Holy shit this is a blast from the past. This show was my jam as a kid. The animation has aged horribly, but I'd be so down to watch the whole series again.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah, even Toy Story 1 animation is dated, which is feature-quality, not TV, and it came out after Reboot.

I admire the historic technical feat. For example, they didn't have inverse kinematics back then, meaning they couldn't plant the character's feet on the ground or hands on a surface and move the body without the limbs moving as well. They'd have to repose the hands and feet to line up. It's why so many shots don't show their feet unless they're standing still and why the boy (enzo?) is always diving into the shot.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I kinda feel like the remaster makes the animation look worse, or just highlights how primitive it was. Maybe the lower resolution etc of the original subconsciously lowers my expectations.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago

I see it very differently, although it looks primitive, the added detail really emphasizes just how much effort this was considering it was made in the early '90s.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This. It was meant to be viewed at 480p.

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

And on a CRT screen

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I rewatched it like 10 years back I think? It was always this bad. I remember thinking "wow this animation is way worse than I remember" even back then when I was rewatching it. Nostalgia plays a huge part in my opinion. Like how you'd play games on the PS2 and think to yourself "wow games look so realistic these days" but when you go back they look awful compared to today's standards.

[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Later seasons do look much better, though. You can watch them upgrade their hardware in real time. Shadows, more polygons, more actors on screen, etc.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It's honestly pretty amazing to watch in hindsight instead of when they were being released. You can see the progress and it's pretty cool.

[–] Yokozuna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The ps1 game was horrible if I can recall from my kid brain correctly. I had forgotten what this series was called for YEARS, and it bugged me so much. I'm glad that's finally off of my chest.

[–] kurikai@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The PS1 game is awesome