Why River over Hyprland?
- Stable
- Faster
- Tag system - I was dwm user on x, so it felt comfy.
- Minimal - I don't like rounded corners or confusing animations
Details
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)
Unixporn
15406 readers
79 users here now
Unixporn
Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!
Rules
- Post On-Topic
- No Defaults
- Busy Screenshots
- Use High-Quality Images
- Include a Details Comment
- No NSFW
- No Racism or use of racist terms
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can only say "good luck". It is not an easy distro. Though if the apps you use are available as flatpaks, you may be fine.
Not easy to install or not easy to maintain? Or do you mean like a lack of packages
Installation is pretty easy if you choose the Xfce version. The system is stable but many things in it (such as the init system) are unpopular which makes the learning curve very steep. The repo doesn't have that many packages so you have to rely on Flatpak (or Snap but idk if it works on Void) for software support. Hardware support and drivers may be an issue because of that as well.
Ah ok gotcha. My plan was to try dual booting so i still have a working arch system in case something doesn't work. Thanks for the tips!
I love Void, but the small repo did make me change to Artix with Runit.
Honestly, Void is pretty straightforward, great distro.
I keep forgetting artix can do runit, I'll have to tinker with that
I think Void is much easier to maintain than Arch. And I was on Arch for 4 years. Runit is super simple too.
I'm glad to hear it!