this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
452 points (95.4% liked)

[Dormant] Electric Vehicles

3202 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to:

!electricvehicles@slrpnk.net

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion.
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling.
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Sunshine@lemmy.ca
Ceres@lemmy.world
452
BYD would still have the cheapest EV in the US, even with a 100% tariff (electrek.co)
submitted 2 months ago by MyOpinion@lemm.ee to c/evs@lemmy.world
215 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Even with the new 100% tariff on electric vehicles imported from China, BYD would still have the cheapest EV in the US. According to a new report, BYD’s lowest-priced EV would still undercut all US automakers at under $25,000.

After discontinuing the production of vehicles powered entirely by internal combustion engines in March 2022, BYD has been at the forefront of the industry’s shift to EVs.

Honestly in my opinion it is time to remove all tariffs on EVs under 25k and let anyone who wants to fill that slot in. American car manufacturers refuse to fill the market need.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

A certain presidential candidate loves to beat that drum but consistently fails to mention that the immediate effect of new tarriffs is making Americans poorer.

How poor do you think Americans will be when all their jobs are replaced with Chinese slave labor? Are you really just completely ignorant of the purpose of tariffs?

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Are you really just completely ignorant of the purpose of tariffs?

Re-read what I wrote:

the immediate effect of new tarriffs is making Americans poorer.

Do tariffs work? Maybe. You also have to remember that China will retaliate and impose tariffs on US good, so overall the effects of tariffs are rarely a net benefit for anyone - which is why they're rarely a good idea.

But the fact remains that the day after tariffs are applied, Americans lose access to cheaper goods. That's just a dry fact.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

the immediate effect

okay so...tomorrow is just not important?

Do tarriffs work? Maybe

LOL of course they do, that's why countries around the world have been using them for literal centuries...

That's just a dry fact.

It's a dry fact that completely ignores many other factors. Sometimes govs make decisions that make sacrifices that achieve a net benefit. They'd be fucking morons not to.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

okay so...tomorrow is just not important?

Again, reread what I wrote: I made no comment on the long term efficacy of tariffs. All I said was that when a presidential candidate says "we'll make China pay", it's factually incorrect.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl -1 points 2 months ago

I made no comment on the long term efficacy of tariffs

...which is precisely the problem.