Programming

17326 readers

150 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

295

Oracle urged again to surrender JavaScript trademark (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 month ago by nkat2112@sh.itjust.works to c/programming@programming.dev

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This article makes for an interesting read. Here follow two early paragraphs for context:

Oracle controls the JavaScript trademark because in 2009 it acquired Sun Microsystems, which applied to trademark the name with the US Patent and Trademark Office back in 1995. The trademark was granted in 2000.

While the database giant does not use the name for any commercial products, its ownership of the trademark has led JavaScript-oriented organizations such as events biz JSConf to adopt branding that avoids the term. As the signatories to the letter observe, the world's most popular programming language therefore can't have a conference that mentions what it's about.

Toward the end, the article mentions an initiative to legally pursue Oracle for trademark abandonment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If it's such a problem, maybe we just collectively move on to ES or TypeScript nomenclature?

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Typescript and JavaScript are different languages and the distinction is important, especially because the two are used in conjunction with each other.

[–] gencha@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Especially because TypeScript compiles down to ~~JavaScript~~ JS

[–] Venat0r@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah but why would you ever use javascript instead of typescript.

Don't answer that. 😂

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

Because I'm a browser and I can't read typescript.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For an application? Never. I'd still use it for something very small like a build script where the hassle of separate compile and run stages makes the whole thing a hassle to use. That might change now, though, since I think Node has gained the ability to execute Typescript directly.

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 1 points 1 month ago

Been using vite for a while and haven't had to think about it.

Glad node is catching up. But it'd spare even more headaches if it natively supported ES6 modules

[–] starshipwinepineapple@programming.dev 13 points 1 month ago

The article mentions that the letter indicated intent to petition with the USPTO to cancel the Javascript trademark due to abandonment. Hopefully that is successful since that seems to be the best outcome short of Oracle willingly forfeiting it.