this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
841 points (97.5% liked)

linuxmemes

21281 readers
2180 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    841
    Snap out of it (lemmy.zip)
    submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by 299792458ms@lemmy.zip to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
     

    How do you guys get software that is not in your distribution's repositories?

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm a technically savvy but new to Linux user who installed Mint as my primary OS about a month ago. So far I've used Flatpaks and AppImages without any issue and haven't come across snaps. Would you explain the differences and why I would care about one over another?

    [–] KevinNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

    At the end of the day, they're just different ways of reaching the same goal: universal packages for Linux. I personally use them interchangeably depending on the application and use case.

    There are some packages that definitely work better and are intended to be used and installed via your native package manager (if they rely on system libraries and whatnot). But using either a Flatpak or AppImage results in the same experience - in my experience. It's a personal preference.

    [–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    IMO flatpaks are the future of installing linux apps. The comment you replied to lives in the past. System package manager should be for system binaries, not for applications.

    [–] Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    But I like my applications years out of date and I think its good that every distro has to spend manhours on packaging it individually.

    [–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    lmao you joke but half this thread is exactly that opinion

    [–] Schmeckinger@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I see the appeal for the package manager for a lot of things, but space got so incredibly cheap and fast that duplication is way less of a deal than the effort to make stuff work the traditional way. But im not a real linux user. I don't like tinkering, I want to download something and it works. And the amazing thing is we can have both. If people like spending time to package something be my guest.

    The funniest interaction I had recently. I downloaded a program that isn't in my package manager or had any sort of flatpack/appimage so I downloaded it as a deb and it didn't run because of some dependency. So I could clone the git and build it from source which might have worked, but I was too lazy to. So I just downloaded the windows exe and ran it through wine, which worked flawlessly.

    [–] meliante@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

    I don't like tinkering, I want to download something and it works.

    And this is what's keeping Linux at bay. Normies are that to the extreme. They want something that is as simple and resilient as possible, they couldn't care less about the dependencies or even know what they are. They want ~~a program~~ an app and just install it from an "app store" if possible.

    [–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago

    you are a real linux user don't let some neckbeard tell you otherwise :P