politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
A formal declaration of war, and the battle with the Swifties has been engaged.
edit: another epic rant may be starting:
Unrealized tax on capital gains? That wording would mean the tax on capital gains is unrealized, not a Tax on Unrealized capital gains you stable business genius
Reverse Deportation? So you want to stop deportation and/or import people? JFC
If they are failing, seems like they would becoming less of/not a threat?
Hey, he's reversing the deportations!
Breaking: Trump Encourages Illegal Immigration! As seen on the internet!
Trump discourages legal migration! Said on TV!
Someone should show Trump Nextdoor. He’d fucking love that app.
He is that app
He's telling the rich to fear another great depression as if the rich didn't make fucking bank during the actual great depression.
Also... the rich were the caused the great depression.
His supporters are too dumb to know that.
"The ~~boy~~ chonky fascist who cried wolf"
Wouldn't reverse deportation be sending American citizens to a different country? TBH, there's definitely cases I would at least entertain that argument.
The Unrealized Tax is a bit iffy though. Not sure I entirely agree with it.
What do you disagree with specifically? It only affects people with over $100M in wealth.
Do you think the tax goes too far, and if so, why are you protecting the wealth of the 1%?
Or do you think the tax doesn't go far enough, and if so, wouldn't opposition it just mean not passing a tax at all, which would be worse?
Or do you know nothing about her proposal and thought it was going to affect your paltry investment income?
Just from my small brain viewpoint, the owner hasn't sold the house or anything, so they shouldn't be taxed, and rent income is already taxed, so if they're using it to rent, this might trickle down to increase rent costs. Although, on the other hand. This only affects the ultra rich, so maybe they have it coming to them.
To expand your analogy to the house on how the rich used their unrealised gains.
You buy a house and it appreciates in value. You bowwow money against the capital gains and use that to live on. Your house price goes up further, generating more capital gains that you can now bowwow against to pay back your previous loan.
edit: also since you're so filthy rich the banks give you really low interest rates, way less than tax would have been.
Don't be reductive. Anyone who owns $100M worth of investments, be they stocks, bonds, or real estate holdings, needs to pay more in taxes.
This is targeting 1%ers hoarding capital, not your rental properties. We'll come after landlords' underserved income later as we further tackle the housing affordability crisis.