this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
28 points (83.3% liked)

Science

13206 readers
8 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thank you! I read most of the first one and skimmed the second -- I don't get why they strikes would need to be done by NATO personnel.

Both articles allude to the fact that Putin considers it to be an attack by NATO because they'd be NATO-supplied weapons, but given his track record, he'd probably say anything more than turning a blind eye is an offense by NATO.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The strikes have to be done by NATO personnel because these missiles use NATO satellite guidance, and are designed to only be operated by military personnel of the respective countries. This was earlier confirmed by Scholtz as a justification for not sending taurus missiles to Ukraine, and the leaked conversation of German officers.

Western media omits the important part of the statement, but If you listen to what he says, he's specifically talking about NATO personnel operating the weapons https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBjK08eM1Ys

[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That could make sense. I'm not familiar enough with military weaponry to know how true it all is

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, so if they just provide training to members of the Ukrainian military, then everything's fine in Putin's eyes? Loopholes are great

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 months ago

What part of the concept of a direct conflict are you struggling with?