this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
356 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

58312 readers
4706 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Pot: Kettle

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hannesh93@feddit.org 127 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Brazil first, Australia 2nd and hopefully EU third nail in the coffin for that clown's platform

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh, X is banned in Brazil and Australia? Or what happened in those countries?

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 67 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Banned in Brazil, forced to pay 10% of global earnings per day until stopping misinformation posting in Australia.

[–] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

10% of global earnings? Isn't it losing money? Makes it sound like they're paying him.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Earnings is incoming money before any expenditures

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 19 points 2 weeks ago

Earnings is different from profits.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Thanks! Good to hear.

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

X is forbidden from offering services in Brazil until and unless it complies with the local courts (the company refused an order to suspend some accounts, then wouldn't appoint a local representative as Brazilian law requires). Local ISPs are required to block it. I don't know about Australia.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Thanks! Last I heard X chose to comply with Brazil's requirements.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

It's all mentioned in the linked article