this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
418 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

19593 readers
750 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh no, not just my build server, Microsofts build server... Everyones' Azure build server - (if you're building on windows)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bappity@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I don't get the appeal of azure because of things like this.

annoying how much they try to push it

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Moving to the cloud is a business decision not a technical one.

Csuite sees us spending Capex 200K on a server or 2 and several thousand opex per year to maintain it.

Cloud takes that 200K Capex and move it to Opex with significant markup markup.

From a technical pov we st it as a waste but business will business itself into cost overruns

[–] DudeDudenson@lemmings.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

But they promised we could save a ton of money with their monitoring dashboards we won't look at until suddenly we get a bill that is 5x what they promised!

[–] JerkyChew@lemmy.one 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lifting and shifting an existing monolithic architecture to the cloud with zero modernization changes will result in a higher cost than leaving it in a data center.

Converting the application to use as much serverless and microservice-based technology as possible is where the cloud ROI is.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

For a lot of things, that means pretty much re-architecting and re-coding an entire application / system pretty much from scratch.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The company I work for loves Azure. If it's not available as an Azure service it won't be used (except for uptime kuma). Some time ago there was a global Azure outage and we could do literally nothing. All tasks and code were on Azure Devops and all communication went through Teams and Outlook.

The webhook integration has also recently been removed from Teams so uptime kuma also didn't work for like a week until it was fixed by using Azure's automation service.

[–] Odinkirk@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 months ago

If it's not available as an Azure service it won't be used (except for uptime kuma).

What Clive Barker movie do you live in?

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Azure is absolute trash. Its like Word but for the cloud.

[–] JetpackJackson@feddit.org 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, they do have word for the cloud now.. But I get what you're saying

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Word for the cloud is like Word, but for the cloud.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 15 points 2 months ago

Walled garden or die

Thats how i read azure

[–] tiny@midwest.social 7 points 2 months ago

If you look at it as generic could provider it's not good, but if you look at it as making m$ run they're software instead of you it's awesome because most m$ software is not fun to run

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I personally prefer Azure over AWS.