this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
57 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13017 readers
86 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I believe the problem is never showing evidence, but that the evidence is overwhelming. I could explain the general idea and, maybe, one or two specifics. People that use the XX/XY binary argument wouldn’t be able to explain either, but it’s usually only used because it conforms to a bias. And we are only talking about humans here. Language would implode if we tried to maintain convenient binaries and still back it up with science.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So where do we draw the line in sports?

[–] elfpie@beehaw.org 19 points 2 months ago

I don't know. Sports conventions are not science. When I see the history of things being banned or allowed, it doesn't always make sense. Then we have stuff like weight categories. Anyway, that's beside the scope of this particular discussion.

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago

We draw the line by weight classes and/or muscle mass, not by what's in person's pants. It doesn't have to be just 2 categories or the same categories for every sport, either.

[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why should we have to?

There is literally no reason for sex segregation in sports

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Chess has 2 devisions women's and everyone why all top chess players male then? Most basketball has he same arrangement why only men in best teams why no women?

[–] davehtaylor@beehaw.org 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a joke, right? Sorry if I'm missing sarcasm here