this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
135 points (97.2% liked)

xkcd

8825 readers
105 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Original static webpage version: https://what-if.xkcd.com/115/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I usually feel like I have an intuitive answer to "what ifs?" This one really surprised me to find that the answer is basically "nothing"

[–] dil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

And I was then double surprised that being inside the sun for a nanosecond would be so devastating!

  • 10^-5 J on the surface, when 5 J is needed for a burn
  • Surface of the sun is a few thousand degrees, inside is a few million

So like a jump off 10^3. No problem, should still be fine.

Not even remotely! I didn't look too close, but the equation he linked has temperature raised to the forth, so a temperature jump of 10^3 would result in 10^12 difference in energy.

Which would increase the 10^-5 J on the surface to 10^7 J. Which explains why you'd only have femtoseconds!

A real double whammy of unintuitive results.

[–] TedZanzibar@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah I'd have been interested to know how long it would take to suitably warm up from the surface. I guess we'll never know.