Gaming

20004 readers

168 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Metallinatus@lemmy.ml

peternile@lemmy.ml

164

The hubris of AAA publishing in three panels. (lemmy.ml)

submitted 2 months ago by JoMiran@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Good bones? I thought the gameplay looked uninspired even taking into account it's development age.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 2 months ago

True, it was a really well done clone, but it was well done. The game worked. It wasn't terribly buggy.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

This is exactly it. The game seemed fine, but it wasn’t doing anything to steal you away from your other games. On top of that it is $40, so there is barrier to entry. I feel bad for the developers, but the marketing team did not do enough research.