this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
19 points (85.2% liked)

Electric Vehicles

3224 readers
144 users here now

A community for the sharing of links, news, and discussion related to Electric Vehicles.

Rules

  1. No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, casteism, speciesism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No self-promotion
  4. No irrelevant content. All posts must be relevant and related to plug-in electric vehicles — BEVs or PHEVs.
  5. No trolling
  6. Policy, not politics. Submissions and comments about effective policymaking are allowed and encouraged in the community, however conversations and submissions about parties, politicians, and those devolving into general tribalism will be removed.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
19
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by MyOpinion@lemm.ee to c/evs@lemmy.world
 

In recent months, we’ve seen the automotive industry pivot away from a focus on battery electric vehicles (BEVs). Now, the EV movement faces a unique set of challenges that could come after the rise of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). If people get hooked on PHEVs, we could find ourselves having a tough time getting car buyers to want to move on from “the best of both worlds.” In this article, I want to talk about what some of those challenges are and what we can do to get past them.

The Challenges PHEV Dominance Could Pose First, we need to talk about infrastructure. The cold hard fact is that the federal government simply can’t fund all of the charging stations we’d need for everyone to be able to go electric. The government theoretically could afford it, but the kind of spending that would be needed would fail to get past political hurdles.

The funding for EV charging stations in the Infrastructure Bill wasn’t meant to solve the problem entirely. It was meant to break the Catch-22 where people don’t want EVs because there aren’t enough charging stations, allowing more early mainstream adoption, which in turn would lead to more demand for charging stations. This, it was thought, would lead to more private investment to meet the new demand.

In other words, the Biden folks don’t want to fuel the car. They only want to jump-start it. If the next generation of mainstream electrified vehicles doesn’t need the infrastructure, that could cause the growth of EV infrastructure and BEVs to sputter.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah no. I have a PHEV and it truly is the best of both worlds. Enough range for all electric daily commuting and errands and a massive range (500+ miles) for traveling between US cities. And I don’t have to wait on the shitty chargers that work 50% of the time in the electric charging network in the US. It’s fantastic.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Yes, this article, and especially the content you replied to, makes me think they don't understand why people want these types of vehicles. Also, that they don't even understand what they are saying.

Worst of both worlds? Do people regularly need to drive 300+ miles a day? No. Around town driving is usually less than 50 miles a day and occasionally they want to take a road trip. That's where I live. I'm not gonna go full electric and then try to drive 500+ miles. The infrastructure just isn't there yet. Even with plug-in hybrids, it'll get there.