politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
"Why did it take 3 1/2 years to do anything on immigration?"
LOL.
CNN wants people to think they haven't been doing anything.
But she has.
And it's working.
Bet with more even more investment they wouldn't even need the Border Deal that Trump killed.
Backstopping Coca-Cola and the United Fruit Company. Feel like I'm telling Sam Adams that we got a big new investment from East India Tea.
It's crazy to me that 'convincing American businesses to move some production to an underdeveloped nation' is being thrown around like it's a good thing.
I mean, the Marshall Plan was kind of a good thing. Rebuilding Japan and the half of South Korea we hadn't completely flattened a good thing.
But are we talking about developing enormous new blocks of housing, schooling, transport, and hospitalization in these countries? Or is Target just expanding the sweatshops?
Imagine the North coming in after the Civil War and building more plantations...
Oh, if they proposed something like the Marshall Plan I'd be fucking pleased.
This is just convincing US companies to take advantage of the cheap labor, as if they really needed that much convincing.
Labor is cheaper overseas. The Philippines, Indonesia, and Bangladesh have people working in what amount to little more than slave camps. Latin American governments struggle harder to keep their populations in line, as evidenced by socialist uprisings in Nicaragua, Cuba, Bolivia, and Venezuela.
I think we're in agreement. "Kamala leads a 4.5 gagillion dollars in private investment in central america" might as well read "American companies exploit central-American destabilization by securing their cheap labor"
It's not a policy we should be celebrating as a success.
What a crazy coincidence that the policy in question specifically excluded Nicaragua, Cuba, and Venezuela lol