I never said anything about the UN's credibility. You are attacking it but then you also go and cite a UN report that you failed to even link to... I would love a link if you have it. Regardless I think the report is worth reading. They specifically explain how all the evidence was gathered and some of it is stuff you could even check for yourself

I definitely would never purposely imply that the UN is "neutral". It's a collection of large and complex institutions, sometimes fighting against each other. The previous president of the World Bank for example, Jim Yong Kim, spent the 90s protesting about the fact that the World Bank and the IMF were the US's tools to financially enslave the Third World. Attributing something to "the UN" is meaningless. That's why I specifically pointed out the background of the report, who did it, etc

Btw I think you should reread my comment. I think there was some misunderstandings. I'm pretty clearly critical of the media narratives around it. You're kinda going off for no reason