this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
121 points (96.2% liked)
PC Gaming
8581 readers
898 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I wouldn’t be even mildly shocked to eventually find out that there’s some sort of back room deal between MS and Intel
Me neither. But. I think the answer is much simpler here: Microsoft doesn't make their money with schedulers, but bundling that Office and tracking to everybody, and charging rent every month. They have way less people working on making the kernel as fast as possible, compared to Linux where:
This is why, for a pro user, Linux is an amazing platform.
Wait a minute. Was this sarcastic or do I get to lore dump? In case you weren't aware, Intel has been doing this shit to AMD for decades. And so has Nvidia.
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna33882525
https://www.neowin.net/news/eu-fines-intel-400-million-for-blocking-amds-market-access-through-payments-to-pc-makers/
https://www-purepc-pl.translate.goog/intel-oraz-nvidia-mieli-wewnetrzna-umowe-ktora-blokowala-tworzenie-laptopow-z-amd-renoir-oraz-geforce-rtx-2070-i-wyzej?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US
Like this was a 3 minute Google search adventure.
I'm assuming they're specifically meaning a deal regarding not fixing the scheduler issues
To be completely honest, I'd be more surprised if there wasn't.