this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
121 points (96.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8581 readers
898 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 62 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I wouldn’t be even mildly shocked to eventually find out that there’s some sort of back room deal between MS and Intel

[–] pimeys@lemmy.nauk.io 47 points 2 months ago

Me neither. But. I think the answer is much simpler here: Microsoft doesn't make their money with schedulers, but bundling that Office and tracking to everybody, and charging rent every month. They have way less people working on making the kernel as fast as possible, compared to Linux where:

  • there are many companies running crazy workloads 24/7, and providing patches
  • very talented individual hackers who have an open source kernel and can play around with things, getting that last oomph out from their system

This is why, for a pro user, Linux is an amazing platform.

[–] BellyPurpledGerbil@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Irremarkable@fedia.io 19 points 2 months ago

I'm assuming they're specifically meaning a deal regarding not fixing the scheduler issues

[–] Irremarkable@fedia.io 20 points 2 months ago

To be completely honest, I'd be more surprised if there wasn't.