I see a lot of people saying they'd love to have that type of content here when Meta federates, and that those will be the best instances because they will have the most content, but they will still be accessible without compromising their privacy.

I truly don't get this.

I'm not here for mass-produced content, if I wanted that, I'd be in other platforms. The beauty of these communities is they are not filled with posts that are all the same, algorithms and bots. It's just a community of real people having conversations.

If you want mass-produced trendy content, please, consume it elsewhere, and when you are inevitably fed up, then come here and enjoy the slow-paced, real community.

PD: I hope this doesn't come across as wall-keeping (or however it's said lol), It's my honest opinion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It’s not really the content quality or mass usage that bothers me. The Fediverse is built on ideals of open source, privacy, decentralization, controlling your own experience and your own data, etc… All these things are incompatible with Meta and other mega corporations. In fact they are a direct threat to corporate greed. Meta is not a friend of the Fediverse and its premise, and their meddling here can only erode those ideals. Regardless of content, number of users, and so on, I hope the devs, at least, can stay the course and not cave to corporate pressure, and that all the Twitter/Reddit refugees can remember why they ultimately left those platforms in the first place.

[–] Magiwarriorx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The Fediverse is built on ideals of open source, privacy, decentralization, controlling your own experience and your own data, etc…

How is Fediverse built on privacy and "controlling your own data"? Essentially every action you take on here is public, and there's no way to ensure all federated servers respect deletion requests. As it currently stands, the Fediverse has fundamental flaws with privacy.

[–] itsAsin@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

i don't even want to imagine whatever scenario would cause us all to up and have to move on from fediverse 10 years from now.

it feels so fresh and clean and innocent.

[–] coldhotman@nrsk.no 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Very well said. Unfortunately the devs are a diverse group. I know Mastodon lead dev is positive. I wouldn't be surprised if the self-proclaimed communist devs of Lemmy aren't quite as positive.