this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
130 points (93.9% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5091 readers
1101 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
130
Here's how much cropland could be freed up if Americans ate half as much meat (grist.org)
submitted 1 month ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Slaughter the majority of exaliating stock over the course of a year and sell the rest as pets.

Not actually serious, but all of the major meat producing animals are slaughtered before their first birthday so phasing it out would take care of the population without needing to release millions of stock.

The real question is whether the species should be reintroduced to nature or not. It isn't like there are wild cattle outside of Africa and maybe Asia other than buffalo anymore*. We would need to take the time to reintroduce feral livestock so they could adapt.

*that I can recall off the top of my head.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Cattle don't have any of the survival instincts left, and they have been bred to be docile and overproducers of milk and meat. They would die of starvetion or dehydration with swollen udders and any number of horrific diseases.

That's not to say they are better off in factory farms, but if the question is should we reintroduce them to the wild, I would say no.

[–] groet@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are many breeds of cattle. Some which are on their own for most of the year. I am sure with some carefully selection (and maybe a few generations of crossbreeding) there could be viable breeds for reintroduction to most biomes which historically had wild cows

[–] hakase@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hawaii has wild cattle that you can hunt. Not native, but still quite wild, and very dangerous.