this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2024
690 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

58108 readers
4981 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/39437325

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RockyC@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I feel like this is a product looking for a market. Why would anyone ever trust that much data to something so fragile and easy to lose?

[–] recapitated@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

I use a 2tb (iirc) in my steam deck. Perfect application for that... Low rewrites, but totally expendable/replaceable data.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

4k Drones, upgradeable phones, DLSR cameras, Data per weight etc.

I own a 1tb ssd for my Steam Deck, literally 0 complaints, runs real fast, can't feel any heat, never need to take it out other than if I'm factory resetting, it's perfect! (though Valves next deck should just have a bigger ssd slot)

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They're not for long term storage, they're for transient storage like photography, in particular stuff like surveillance cameras

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

if you want long term CCTV setup properly you should be using ethernet connected security cameras and then transmitting it back to a central server with a hdd always recording. It's much more reliable and way more cost effective, just requires you running an ethernet cable to where the camera is.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah but the live feed and remote downloading sucks

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

with ethernet the live feed is perfectly fine, and there is no remote downloading, it's all streamed over the ethernet to a central box which handles everything from there. You might need some decode/encode capabilities, but to my understanding a lot of cameras will run multiple hardware encodes straight from the sensor over to the network already. So you probably don't need much.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

personally i don't have a cctv setup at the moment, so i can't give any recommendations, but you'd be looking for POE capable cameras, and you'd need a POE enabled switch, and a computer connected to that switch in order to handle the incoming data, including software obviously. But it's probably also dependent on the camera itself, nicer cameras are probably going to be more flexible.

there are plenty of decent videos about homelab based CCTV setups out there if you're looking to dig into them a bit more.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It depends on the type of location, small remote locations might not even get their own local network

yeah and at that point you're probably not using a microsd card i would figure. You have a small computer in there already, might as well throw in an SSD or something.

I guess if you needed the sheer capacity of 4TB you might use a micro sd, but you're probably gambling more than you're saving at that point.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd love them for my dash cam if they were affordable. My camera records in front and behind of my van in 4k, so that's 90-100 gigs an hour. I leave it running as a surveillance camera when I'm parked, so just going to work and back in one day would use over a terabyte.

[–] RockyC@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would you continuously record? Just record motion events and you won’t need a card that large at all, plus it will last a lot longer.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Busy parking lots always have motion.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Filming 8K in a raw format maybe? (a lot of cameras only have an SD card slot, or only the sd card slot is fast enough to record raw at higher resolutions)

You probably wouldn't need to take it out of the camera either? so the form factor wouldn't be major concern.

[–] michael_palmer@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago

It's only 104 MB/s. Not enough for RAW video.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Also could be handy for smuggling banned movies/tv shows into authoritarian countries that block or outlaw unauthorised VPNs?

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Though for the price these will retail for, would probably be easier to take more, smaller capacity cards...

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also useful for devices where you want more storage but the device only has an SD card slot, or other slots are already occupied or sd card is just easier such as phones, Nintendo switch, steam deck, ultra light laptops, raspberry pi...