this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
1352 points (97.6% liked)

Comic Strips

12607 readers
4908 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago (8 children)

The cheaper the item, the bigger the brand.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 38 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

Store brand tshirts from places like C&A are often entirely plain, meanwhile expensive brands like Gucci are all about plastering their logo everywhere. I'd be surprised if Gucci shirts actually had lower production costs than C&A shirts.

[–] faintwhenfree@lemmus.org 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Even brands like gucci and their line up, their entry level will have bigger brand logos, because they know people who buy entry level gucci are people who want to show the world they have gucci. Real rich people will buy something more cleaner looking.

[–] 1stQ@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like rich people are paying to get the ads removed.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Not necessarily. The big fashion brands are about just that: fashion. Of course, some use the logo as a pattern, like Louis Vuitton.

The lower tier products are for people who can’t afford the high end stuff but want to own something “Gucci” or “Fendi” or “Chanel.” Those t-shirts with the logos emblazoned on them are either the high end brands exploiting an easier revenue stream or knock-offs. Make no mistake, Gucci isn’t above charging average people $80 to $100 for a T-shirt!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)