268
Harris is already thinking about Cabinet choices and looking to get younger, more diverse than Biden
(www.independent.co.uk)
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
268 points (96.5% liked)
politics
19090 readers
4814 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Diversity of experience brings diversely of ideas. Why do you think Hollywood has been churning out so much of the same stuff over and over? Because it's a bunch of old rich white dudes with decades of experience in financing movies calling the shots.
Having a transportation secretary that grew up in the suburbs, had their first car bought for them by their parents, and has been driving everywhere their whole life is going to bring very car-centric ideas. A transportation secretary that grew up in The Bronx, took the subway and bus growing up, and only got a car when they realized they needed to because the only apartment they could afford was not near a line that could get them to work will bring a very different set of ideas.
Look at the writing team of the acolyte and Tell me how it's old white men https://m.imdb.com/title/tt12262202/fullcredits/writer?ref_=tt_ov_wr_sm Fact is that anyone can write a bad story and bringing up Hollywood is not quiet the own you think it is
Did I say writing teams? Did I say actors? Did I say directors? No, I said the FINANCERS. The studio heads. The ones making the final calls about what gets made. Are there some people of color? Some women? Of course. But Executive directors and boards running studios are disproportionately populated by white men. These are the studios that keep saying "More Star Wars! All of it! More superheroes! More Transformers! Reboot reboot remake sequel reboot!"
They can have hits (like Andor) but they are making decisions that show how little they understand their audience. Black Panther was released in February, the month studios save movies that they don't care about for since it's finally done with Oscar season. It was one of the biggest cultural phenomenons at the time and completely by accident.
Sounds like you do care about color and race because you're making it about that, when we're clearly talking about diversity of experience. Nobody is talking about not hiring a qualified candidate. It's very possible to have qualified candidates from different walks of life who will have different ideas about how to handle things. That diversification of backgrounds/past experiences leads to ideas and solutions that might not have been considered otherwise.
I found a picture of you
their username though
Diversity of experience is different than diversity of qualifications. I should have specified. No one is hiring unqualified individuals simply because they are "diverse".
Not caring about color or race is an ideal that I hope we can all reach some day. But right now, the effects of the racism of the past (a time when people cared about color and race in order to give advantages to some at the intentional expense of others) is still very much present. My father was born before Brown v. Board of Ed. My mother was born before the Civil Rights Act. The advantages they had simply by being born white (because of years and years of racist laws and policies) allowed them to get good educations and let me and my sisters, born 20+ years after "we solved racism*" with the civil rights act, to live a life free of poverty. If my parents had been born black, their quality of education would have been different, and the quality of life we enjoyed would have been substantially lower.
I grew up thinking "no need to worry about race, those racists of the past are all gone and can't hurt anyone anymore." But the decisions they made continue to hurt those around today. Even assuming things got better since the 50s, there's still generational wealth missing from disadvantages communities, wealth that people born then would have been available to pass down to their families today, but they were blocked from obtaining by force of law.
I sincerely hope you take the time to read this and understand why people want to include diversity as a part of hiring decisions. They are qualified and experienced enough to know that it makes a difference for many reasons.
*We didn't actually solve racism
I'm sorry where did anyone say the cabinet members would be unqualified?
You know they mean the DEI... Virtue signaling
you didn't answer my question
I don't get this line of reasoning. Diversity has inherent value in all matters of human resources and socializing.
Emotional intelligence is a four-fold better predictor of economic and family success outcomes than cognitive intelligence. Wonder how you'd fair on either metric.
Sure sure
The problem is that qualified is relative. What’s the different between a Harvard degree and random 4 year college in the boonies? There are a lot of factors that determine how good someone’s education was.