honestly I think historically it would have made way more sense for inheritance to go through tha matrilineal line. I mean even if everything remains the same it makes more sense for a guy to be king because his mother is part of the family line. I am in no way endorsing monarchy in modern times I am just talking about the past. It seems obvious to me that family lines are more definitive by who actually bore you as opposed to who possibly inseminated.

[–] bloop@eepy.express 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

@HubertManne @jawa21 matrilineal inheritance (including crowns) existed among booking and Asian cultures.
There's historical precedent for how it worked

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

whats booking?

[–] bloop@eepy.express 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

@HubertManne @jawa21 Viking.
I didn't notice Google replacing the word.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 4 months ago

ok that would make more sense. thanks.

load more comments (6 replies)