this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
223 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

59118 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Twelve of the largest drug stores in the U.S. sent shoppers’ sensitive health information to Facebook or other platforms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Yendor@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article discusses this.

In these cases, a pixel on the pharmacy website is being downloaded by your IP address. I don’t think there’s anything there would constitute PHI (Protected Health Information) under HIPAA.

In isolation, this data means nothing. But these massive companies can easily link an IP address to a person. And each pixel has a different URL, which identifies what page is calling it (eg, the page that says you’ve added an HIV test to your cart).

The results of the test would be covered by HIPAA, as would any test administered by a doctor or in a hospital setting. But in a pharmacy only prescriptions are covered by HIPAA - anything non-prescription is unprotected.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So if you're privacy conscious and using something like NextDNS to block pixels and other shady tracking mechanisms at the DNS level, all's good? When I left Facebook back in 2016, I started with Pihole, but I like NextDNS because it's easier to use when not at home and I can manage profiles for family members easily in case to do find something they "need" to work. Why people willingly want to see ads is beyond me.

[–] Yendor@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s hard to say, but basic precautions like a browser based ad blocker would filter out probably 90%+ of this tracking. Firefox and Safari even have this baked in to the browser, you just need to turn it on.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The built in “do not track” features require companies to operate in good faith and honor that. I have zero trust In that.

[–] Yendor@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not talking about “Do Not Track”. I’m talking about features like this:

https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/trackers-and-scripts-firefox-blocks-enhanced-track

It’s a Firefox setting that specifically blocks pixels and cross-site cookies. It’s turned on by default, and you can increase it to “strict” if you value privacy over comparability.

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, wasn't aware of that one. Thanks for the info.