this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
124 points (97.0% liked)

Fediverse

28380 readers
1812 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ever wanted to have an RSS feed in Lemmy? Well now you can!

rss.ponder.cat is set up to mirror any RSS feed into a community. You can subscribe to the feed like any other community and you'll get every new story as a Lemmy post.

Check it out:

!nytimes@rss.ponder.cat

!bbc@rss.ponder.cat

!arstechnica_science@rss.ponder.cat

Leave a comment with any RSS feed and I'll create a community for it, and then you can have RSS in your Lemmy.

Check it out!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean you can leverage the votes of Lemmy to drown out ads from otherwise-interesting sources.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Lemmy thunderdome community! All posts get fed in from RSS, but if they don't get upvoted by the time the time limit has passed, they get deleted!

I am joking, I think. It's an interesting idea though. I don't think relying on the algorithm to stem the tide of bot-posted content is a completely complete solution, since I have definitely seen bot-provided communities which annoyed me with the volume of 1-upvote posts which the bot was putting up. I am planning to try to limit the feeds available to those that have a respectable amount of human interaction.

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think relying on the algorithm to stem the tide of bot-posted content is a completely complete solution

Yeah. That's not what I said. I said it would help to filter ads from otherwise-interesting sources.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 3 points 3 months ago

I understand now. I thought you meant something different by crowdsourcing. No worries.