this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2022
18 points (73.7% liked)

World News

32163 readers
985 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're right that there isn't a number available for his wealth, so it has to be inferred from what's publicly known. However, it's quite obvious that Zelensky is utterly corrupt. Even the Guardian admits that Ukraine is the most corrupt nation in Europe. It would be absolutely fantastical that a person who is not corrupt somehow ended up in a position of power in Ukraine. The fact that Zelensky has direct ties to the oligarchs and offshores assets as Pandora papers show is direct proof of corruption.

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It would be absolutely fantastical that a person who is not corrupt somehow ended up in a position of power in Ukraine.

Why not, especially given his platform was anti-corruption? Look, I don't have Zelensky's finances in front of me, I just don't like accusations without a solid basis. I especially don't like them against a man who is the constant target of propaganda from the Russian state and non-state actors.

[–] Catradora_Stalinism@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

bruh every politician's platform in the history of forever has been anti-corruption, and no liberal politician has done a single fucking thing about it.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

These accusations, and facts of his corruption as published in the leaks, were well known before the war started. Trump ran on a campaign of draining the swamp and reducing corruption. Using this logic would mean he's a straight shooter too.

Dismissing everything that doesn't fit the western narrative as Russian propaganda is not rational.