MTG

1924 readers

12 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

andrew@mtgzone.com

mike@mtgzone.com

I really wish they'd use a different method. (scryfall.com)

submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Coskii@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/mtg@mtgzone.com

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Of the 11 new printings of planeswalkers, 4 are in the Commander precons, 1 is normally collectible from the set, and the other 6 have the commander set symbol but aren't in the decks.

This means that if you wanted a chance to pull them yourself from packs, you must be opening collectors boosters as they are the only ones with a slot for commander cards.

It feels so scummy of them to not use special guest slot for cards like this. It's not the first time, and it doesn't only affect the planeswalkers. There are some rather pricy rats (marrow gnawer and Ink eyes) also secluded from standard pull tables this way.

Anyone know when this started? I noticed it a year or so back when there was a green commander set card, but no green commander deck, but I cannot recall the card or set.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

@lovestha Yes, buying bloomburrow reprints are for the aesthetic. Collector booster packs have a higer premium for the aesthetics of foils. Having to pay collector booster prices, not for foils but set cards, is annoying.

Edit: I known people who have thier eyes on the set just for fox Jace, it's capitalism but annoying they have half the point of the set on jacked up prices, the other part of capitalism is we complain it's more than we'll pay.